An Ikeja High Court has yesterday, Thursday, April 16, 2105 adjourned the legal battle between All Progressives Congress, APC Chieftain, Bola Ahmed Tinubu and African Independent Television, AIT. The case was a N150 billion Libel suit filed by Tinubu against the TV station for airing of a documentary titled “Lion of Bourdilion’’ which he claims daunted his reputation .
The Court adjourned the case until May 27, 2015.
Justice Iyabo Akinkugbe adjourned the suit for further direction after hearing the submissions of lawyers representing the claimant and the defendant.
The judge had on April 1, granted an interlocutory injunction restraining the broadcast station from further airing the documentary, pending the determination of the libel suit.
At the resumption of proceedings on Thursday, Tinubu’s counsel, Mr Ayodele Adedipe, told the court that the claimant had filed Forms 17 and 18 which had been served on the defendant.
However, the defendant’s counsel, Mr Jeffery Kadiri, while admitting service, noted that the 42 days period they were expected to file their reply had not elapsed.
Kadiri said the defendant intended to file a counter-claim and join issues with the claimant, adding that a long adjournment was needed to ensure that all processes could get into the court’s file.
Following the development, the judge adjourned the matter, directing that all documents relating to the suit should be filed and entered into the court’s file to enable the parties to proceed to Pre-Trial Conference.
Tinubu’s lead counsel, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), said the documentary showcased various properties and companies across Lagos State purportedly owned by him and he was described as “Nigeria’s biggest landlord’’.
Olanipekun said the programme also claimed that Tinubu was “charged for narcotics’’ in 1993 in the U.S.
He alleged that the documentary was politically sponsored to tarnish Tinubu’s reputation in the eyes of the populace.
Olanipekun had therefore, asked the court to award N150 billion as damages against AIT for tarnishing his client’s reputation.
Responding, Chief Mike Ozekhome, lead counsel to AIT, had argued that the content of the documentary were facts which had been in the public domain for over two decades.
According to him, these were published independently prior to the broadcast and had remained unchallenged till date.
He further contented that Tinubu was a former senator, two-time governor of Nigeria’s most populous state and the leader of the APC which claims to be anti-corruption.
Ozekhome said AIT had a responsibility to its audience to scrutinize their public officers, adding that Tinubu had not shown how the said documentary had damaged his reputation.